Category: Resources

  • Books

    Motivation and Procrastination:

    The War of Art: If you are procrastinator then this is the book for you. By the American author Steven Pressfield, ‘The War of Art: Break Through the Blocks and Win Your Inner Creative Battles’, is a great little book about all the ways writers (or ‘wannabe’ writers) waste time and self-sabotage themselves and their work. It’s part psychological assignation (of you), part practical guide to the mind-set and practice of a professional writer. It’s short and sweet too.

    How to Write a Thesis by Rowena Murray is something of a classic, now in its third edition. Very much a book about process and being smart about it. Essential reading for those of you having to write a thesis or dissertation. Great advice on over coming blocks.

    Developing Your Style:

    Mastering Academic Style by Helen Sword (2012) and published by Harvard University Press is a great book for helping you develop your style. Breaking things down into different aspects of style the book takes you through practical ways of working on your writing. The book also presents examples of writing from different disciplines and is underpinned by some useful linguistic analysis across subjects, to be able to say what different subjects actually do. There is a great chapter on how to hook your reader, and then another on keeping their attention.

    How To Write A Sentence and How To Read One by Standly Fish (2011). I love this little book, reading twice the summer when it first came out. It manages to be beautifully written, practical and at times profound, but the practicality of the book is its best feature. Perhaps more for those in the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, there is, however, something in there for all academic writers. Professor Fish is breaks down some amazing pieces of literature and then shows us how we could try and emulate them. It is about both composition and content. For me it is a great book because of how it asks the reader to think about their writing: to be reflective; to practice; to breakdown what others have done before and use it as a model; to make writing about ideas and the ideas to have a form and function. The chapters on ‘First Sentences’ and ‘Last Sentences’ are very insightful, asking the reader to think about the potential power of these sentences and their relationship to the text as a whole. If I was to say there has one weakness, it is that there is a tendency to atomise sentences, to consider them in isolation (the afore mentioned chapters excluded), rather than their effects (and affects) when working well together, as in a paragraph. This is only a minor quibble however. A must read as far as I’m concerned. Perhaps the follow-up will be ‘How To Write a Paragraph…’?

  • Critical Reading Form

    You can’t be a critical reader by reading only one research paper; and you can’t be a critical writer by only writing about one piece of research. The strongest way to review a paper is to put it into a systematic and meaningful relationship with many other pieces of research that came both before and after it. The following writing exercise is designed to help you develop this skill. It might also save you a bit of time too.

    Developing a strategy for strategically reading research papers and books is also the first step to not being dominated by ‘the literature’. The following writing exercise is designed to set some parameters to your reading and writing.

    You should fill in a Critical Reading Form after every research paper or book you read. This is a good way to keep track of what you have read and develop your critical reading skills. Don’t wait too long or you will forget a lot.

    It’s important to write in full sentences, otherwise when you return to your notes they will make less sense. This also has the benefit of helping you to develop your own critical style of reviewing research.

    It is also good to try not to write too much when reviewing a journal paper, for example, you should try to summarise it with no more than two to three sentences in each section. Being able to summarise books in the same way is also important, though more challenging due to their size and complexity. You can use the Critical Reading Form to summarise a whole book or individual chapters. If a piece of work is more important to your work then you can return to it an write more detail.

    Take no more than 30mins to complete the questions; perhaps try writing to a timer. Make sure the bibliographic data is correct. If you feel you cannot fill in all the sections don’t worry, but realise that it is important to identify the gaps in your knowledge and use them to direct your reading. If you feel a piece of work is particularly important you can indicate it as such and come back to it later for a closer reading.

     

    Critical Reading Form

    1. Authors, title, date, publication title, place of publication, [vol/issue: pp. if a journal paper], type of copy I have (e.g. paper, PDF, notes)

     

    2. What is this work about?

     

    3. What are the main findings of this work?

     

    4. What gap in our understanding does this work fill? (Mention specific papers/researchers) (How is the gap built; do you agree with them; are there short comings to the gap; has it filled a bigger gap than they expected?)

     

    5. What is the research tradition/wp-contentroach/method used?

     

    6. How is this work connected to the wider research field? (Mention specific papers/researchers) This is similar to the gap but also considers the positive ways papers can be associated – i.e. are they done in the same tradition; are they from different disciplines but are interested in the same topic?

     

    7. How is this work relevant to your assignment?

     

    8. What are the limitations of this work? (Mention specific papers/researchers) You may have to track down a full account of the limitations of certain methods or approaches by finding those debates between researchers, which occur from time-to-time in journals.

     

     

    Code: circle as appropriate

    1. Very useful, return to for more detailed analysis

    2. Useful and of general importance

    3. Relevant but of minor importance

    4. Not relevant

     

    Critical Reading Form Tips:

    1.) Create a MS Word template of the critical reading form which you can open and fill in after each paper. In addition set up a filing system on your PC to organise your notes. Remember to back up all your files, getting in the habit of synchronising your home and university computers and any external drives you have.

    2.) Important papers and books you will return to and then add an extra level of detail to the form, writing a paragraph or page for each section of the form.

    3.) Use the forms as examples of your writing and thinking which you can use in supervisory sessions. These forms are good ways to practise your academic style and receive feedback on it.

    4.) Many of the new electronic reference management software packages, which help you build accurate bibliographies, also have sections for notes. You can copy in the content of your form to these notes sections.

  • How To Reference

    A referencing system refers to the typographic system used to embed references into texts external to the one being read. Any one journal consistently uses the same referencing system and often a single system, or variations on it, is used across different publications in an academic discipline. Alignment to a particular system of reference establishes a standardised technical means for encoding the inter-textual support for the arguments constructed by academics.
    Systems of reference can be put into two camps: author-date system, such as Harvard and APA (American Psychological Association), also called ‘in line’ or ‘parenthetical’ systems; and numerical systems, essentially using footnotes or endnotes, MLA (Modern Language Assocation), MHRA (Modern Humanities Research Association), OSCOLA (Oxford Standard for the citation of Legal Authorities) and Vancouver[i]. We will briefly cover how these systems are typographically set out in text and references lists/bibliographies. However, as every system can vary with each house style we will not go into a lot of detail; instead, always refer to the house style, library webpages, or your departmental handbook.
    Author-Date Systems (Harvard, APA)
    Harvard and APA are in line or parenthetical systems. That means that they put a note of the author’s name and the date of the publication in the line of the sentence, but enclosed in round brackets. This parenthetical, in text citation corresponds to an entry on an alphabetically ordered reference list at the end of the document. Therefore, the author’s name of a supporting reference must appear either in the text or in parenthetical brackets. The date must always be in the brackets. For example, the same supporting reference can be combined with your prose in a number of ways:
    Examples:
    Smith and Jones (2010) have asserted…
    or
    It has been asserted (Smith and Jones, 2010) that…
    From the point of view of the logic of the referencing system, whatever is in parenthesis must correspond with an entry in the reference list. As such, a one could refer metonymically to a theory or a book title in the run of prose, giving a varied style, but whatever is in parenthesis follows a strict, unwavering format.
    Examples:
    The Selfish Gene (Dawkins, 1976) synthesised a body of evolutionary research into an original thesis.
    Richard Dawkins (1976) gave an original synthesis to existing research.
    The date of publication immediately follows the author’s name in the second example so that the reader can easily deduce which date and author’s name go together.
    Harvard and APA look very similar and differ in only a few respects, for example Harvard would typically shorten to first author plus et al for three or more authors; whereas APA will list the first six authors in the text but a seven authored research paper would be shorted to first author plus et al. In that regard, here is how the two systems would handle the same reference:
    Harvard Extract:
    Rosie et al (2004) have discussed…
    Harvard Reference List:
    Rosie, M., MacInnes, J., Petersoo, P., Condon, S. and Kennedy, J. (2004), ‘Nation speaking unto nation? Newspapers and national identity in the devolved UK’, Sociological Review, 52(4): pp.437–58.
    APA Extract:
    Rosie, MacInnes, Petersoo, Condon, and Kennedy (2004) have discussed…
    APA Reference List:
    Rosie, M., MacInnes, J., Petersoo, P., Condon, S. and Kennedy, J. (2004). ‘Nation speaking unto nation? Newspapers and national identity in the devolved UK’, Sociological Review, 52(4): 437–58.
    The only noticeable differences are the number of authors which must be stated in the text and, in the example of journal articles, APA italicises both the journal’s name and its volume number, while Harvard would only italicises the journal’s name. The general principle uniting these two parenthetical systems is that the reference is summarised as the name of the authors, plus a corresponding date and where appropriate a page span. This information is available to the reader in the line of the sentence, with this the date and page span always enclosed in parenthesis. If the authors name is included in the sentence and not parenthesis then the bracketed date and page numbers should be clearly linked to the author’s names, either coming immediately after their names or a quote attributed to them.
    Smith and Jones assert that ‘blah, blah, blah’ (1984: 128).
    or
    Smith and Jones (1984: 128) assert that ‘blah, blah, blah’.
    Therefore, both these formulations are acceptable. Each reference in parenthesis must have a corresponding entry into an alphabetical reference list at the end of text.
    One final note on in-line referencing systems: it is not the case that just because such a system is being used that footnotes are out of the question. However, most academic publishers encourage writers when using Harvard not to use too many footnotes as well. This is partly to do with the complexities and financial implications of setting the type for press but it is also partly because in-line systems encourage writers to handle their references in a different manner, moving away from parenthetical comment to having only the relevant information in the text. That said a modified form of Harvard is not unusual to see. A writer must just be careful about consistency in their referencing as the footnote suggests an alternative way to handle references. That being said, there is a system which does combine both in text citations and footnotes, MLA, and we will discuss it in the next section.
    Numerical Systems (MLA, MHRA, OSCOLA, Vancouver)
    Earlier footnote systems did not follow the logic of a numerical system; instead symbols such as the dagger were used[ii]. Modern day footnotes and endnotes are numerical with the first reference starting at one and ascending thereafter. Numbers in the text correspond with numbers either at the bottom of the page or the end of the text. The main characteristics and differences are covered here.
    MLA[iii] is a system used by some humanities subjects. As already indicated, it is a synthesis between an in-text and footnote system. The main supporting references, i.e. those supporting statements being made within the run of the writer’s texts, go in parenthesis. In this respect MLA is like Harvard or APA but the citation in brackets is marked differently. The author’s name is important in this system and can written in full or just as the surname in the text, so instead of ‘Smith highlight the limitations of the current models (39)’ one could also write ‘John Smith highlight the limitations of the current models (39)’. The 39 refers to the page number and note that the date of publication is not given. If making no reference to an author’s name in the run of the text then the same point and supporting reference could be written as:
    The limitations of our current models has already been highlight (Smith 39)
    If the reference is not to a specific page or page span and the author’s name is used in the run of the text then the reference could look like:
    Smith (On The Limitations of Our Current Models) has discussed the shortcomings of the discipline’s present models.
    All references in the text correspond to an alphabetically ordered ‘Cited Works List’ at the end of the text. Additional sources not being used at citations but which you wish to draw attention to can be indicated by the use of either superscript numerical footnotes or endnotes. The most recent edition of the MLA style guide is:
    MLA handbook for writers of research papers (7th edition). New York: Modern Languages Association of America, 2009.
    Here is an example of how a reference would appear in the text and then recorded in the Cited Works List.
    Text:
    Smyth (The Growth of Humanity) attempted to express poetry’s, and the arts more generally, effect on the increased democratisation it the eighteenth century British political system.
    Works Cited List:
    Smyth, Jonathan. The Growth of Humanity: Poetry and the Democratisation of British Politics of the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Wordsworth Press, 1997.
    The author’s name is stressed in the text; correspondingly, in the Works Cited List, the author’s name is surname then forename, followed by the full title of the work, in this case an academic monograph, then the place of publication, the publisher, and finally the year of publication.
    Equally, this could have be rephrased as,
    It has been argued that poetry and the arts had an effect on the increased democratisation it the British political system of the eighteen century (Smyth)
    Or
    The Growth of Humanity suggested poetry and the arts more generally had an effect on the increase democratisation it the eighteenth century British political system (Smyth).
    In both cases the citations in the Works Cited List would be the same. Note in the second example Smyth’s work is paraphrased, whilst in the third example it is referred to metonymically as the name of the monograph. As in the first example Smyth’s name appears in the line of the text it is the name of the work which appears in parenthesis. In the second and third examples, as the author’s name has not be stated in the line of the text then it must be included in the brackets. Therefore, the reader of MLA can always identify the author and the texted referred to.
    Sometimes a citation will not refer to a whole book or journal paper but rather only a portion of it, in which case the page span must be given.
    Text:
    Reading Da Vinci in this way Brown (23-34) recommends a more literal interpretation of what was previously considered allegory.
    Cited Works List:
    Brown, Danielle. Rereading the Masters: Signs and Codes in the Renaissance Oil Painting. Rossyln: Magdalene Press.
    Only a few pages of the cited book refer to Da Vinci in this fictitious reference so they are given in the page span. This of course could also be rephrased as:

    Text:
    Reading Da Vinci in this way a more literal interpretation of what was previously considered allegory has been recommended (Brown 23-34).
    There is no need for a comma between the author’s name and the page span; also there is no need for p. or pp. to be used to indicate the page span.
    In addition to books you may also want to cite journal articles and electronic journal articles, chapters and sections in books, and websites. Here is how to format each in the Cited Works List.
    Book Chapter:
    Smith, John. “Stuff About Things.” The Intellectual Opus. Ed. Edward Ego. Oxford: Genius Press, 2008, 42-77.
    After the author’s name and the chapter title, which appears in double-quotation marks, the editor is indicated, then the place of publication, date and finally the pages span.
    Journal Article:
    Doe, Jane. “Romans, Roads and Rule Books: Roman Infrastructure and Its Role in Pacifying Brittan.” Journal of Roman Archaeology 57 (1987): 211-225.
    Like with the book chapter, the article title goes in double-quotation marks, followed by the journal title in italics, then the volume number (and issue if applicable) of the journal, followed by the date and then the pagination.
    Electronic Journal Article:
    Lee, B. “The Toa of Shakespearian Theatre: The Popularity of Hamlet in Beijing Theatre Schools.” Electronic Journal of Eastern Performing Arts 11.4 (2012): 9-23.Web. 2 December 2009.
    Electronic journal citation is very similar to its paper counterpart, the difference being the web as a source is acknowledges, as is the date the article was accessed.
    MHRA (Modern Humanities Research Association) Style:
    Numbers in brackets, square or round, are used in place of the citation information which goes inside parenthesis in an in-line referencing system. Numbers correspond to footnotes or endnotes and a bibliography at the end of the work. As it uses a bibliography sources not referred to but which you have used are to be listed as well.
    The advantage of the this system is that it is easier on the eye , keeping citation information out of the main text as well as enabling the writer to draw attention to additional information or make a relevant but parenthetical comment. There are few practices worth noting, which differ from other referencing systems thus far. For example the first time a source is referred to the longer citation is given, for example:
    Text:
    The pragmatist’s perspective is one which sees utility as primary over essences (1).
    Footnote:
    Richard Rorty, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, pp. 44-66.
    Bibliography:
    Rorty, Richard, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
    In the text only the number is brackets is used; in the footnote the author’s first name and surname is followed by the text’s title in italics followed by the page span if necessary; while, in the bibliographical listing of the citation, the author’s name is recorded as surname then forename, followed by the full text title in italics, and finally in round brackets the place of publication, the publisher and the date of publication. In the footnote and bibliography the first letter of all verbs, nouns, adjectives, and adverbs should be capitalised. Also capitalise articles (the, in, a etc…) if they are at the start of a sentence or the first word after a colon in the subtitle.
    When referring to a website give the fully URL within < >, as in <.http:www.google.com>, followed by the date the site was accessed, as in [accessed 17 May 2012]. Page spans are given for books, using p. for a single page and pp. for more than one page. It is not necessary to give page spans for journal articles.
    Abbreviated Latin terms, such as ibid and op. cit. are used in MHRA. Ibid is short for ibidem meaning ‘in the same place; while op. cit. is short for opera citato, meaning ‘in the work cited’. Ibid. is used when two or more consecutive references refer to the same source; rather than writing the full citation out in the footnote or endnote again one writes ibid. plus a page number (if referring to a book). Op. cit. is used to refer to a previously cited work but not the previous one, therefore it should always be accompanied by the author’s last name and possibly the date, so that the reader can refer to the bibliography.
    Here is how to format different types of sources in the bibliography.
    Journal Articles:
    Bright, Stuart, ‘Killing in the Name of the King: Justification of Royalist Atrocities in the English Civil War’, British Historical Review, 33.2 (1992), 222-241.
    In journal articles the order is, therefore, author surname, forename, article title in quotation marks, journal title italicised followed by the volume and issue number, the year of publication and finally the pages span.
    Electronic Journal Articles:
    Entwhistle, Tobias, ‘Modernist Sculpture and the Colonisation of Urban Space’, Digital Review of Urban Art, 12.1 (2013), 33-45. <http://www.drua.ac.uk/volume12/3214> [accessed 5 April 2013].
    Electronic journal article are much the same as their paper equivalents, with the addition of the URL inside < > and the date accessed within square brackets.
    Chapter or Section of an Edited Book:
    Cooper, William, ‘Stitching It Together: The Development of Book Construction in Oxford between 1630-1680’. In The History of the Book in England, ed. By John Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962), pp.62-101.
    OSCOLA refer them to a comprehensive source. Meredith, S. and Endicott, T. (2006) Oxford Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities. http://denning.law.ox.ac.uk/published/oscola_2006.pdfVancouver endnotes form the reference list at the end of the document, and additional bibliography can be added for texts used for the preparation of the text but not referred to. Conventionalised abbreviations are used for well know scholarly journals.

    Works Cited List

    [i] For a discussion of the pros and cons of different referencing systems see James Hartley, ‘On Choosing Typographic Settings for Reference Lists’, Social Studies of Science, 32.5-6 (2002), 917-932.
    [ii] See Chuck Zerby The Devil’s Details: A History of Footnotes (New York: Touchstone, 2003).

    [iii] See the MLA website for a complete copy of this style guide http://www.mla.org/style .

  • The Ten Uses of a Comma

    Ever wondered how to use a comma? No. Then you probably should, I t can help your writing and editing. Here the uses of commas in academic English are covered. The first five are the most important in terms of overall sentence structure, whilst the next five cover some other technical comma usage below the level of the clause.

    If you are looking for an overarching rule then it is this: keep it simple. Learn to do the basics correctly and then develop sophistication when appropriate. The longer your sentences the more complex they will be, and correspondingly, the more sophisticated your use of commas, and other punctuation, will have to be to maintain clarity.

    1. Linking coordinating main clauses

    Commas are used to separate main clauses divided by one of the following coordinating conjunctions, such as but, and, or, for, nor, yet, so.

    Example :

    We were unable to locate the cause of pain, so the patient’s discomfort continued.

    Example :

    The data was collected easily, but conclusions proved difficult to reach.

    Example :

    Home owners continue to suffer instability in the housing market, and economists are unable to provide a satisfactory analysis of market volatility.

    NOTE: some people will say that it is unnecessary to put a comma before a coordinating conjunction, particularly when both the main clauses are short. As such, both of the following are acceptable:

    Example :

    Prices rise and prices also fall.

    Example :

    Prices rise, and prices also fall.

    However, a comma should not be used when a coordinating conjunction connects two or more verbs to the subject of the sentence. For example:

    Example :

    Jane Austen mastered her own art and developed possibilities for the future direction of the novel. (Correct)

    Example :

    Marx was financially indebted to Engels, and personally enriched by their friendship. (Incorrect)

     

    2. Marking off introductory and contextualising words and phrases at the start of the sentence

    Introductory and contextualising phrases are often used at the start of sentences in academic English. There are three main types: clauses giving information on the position of the main clause in time and space; clauses adding circumstantial or judgemental information; and introductory words and phrases that move the writing on and can indicate argumentative shifts. We will consider each in turn.

    Example: Time

    Prior to Bourdieu and Foucault, twentieth-century French philosophy was permeated heavily by Marxist and phenomenological thought.

    Example: Space

    Outside of the logical positivist paradigm, Hawthorn (1967) contemplated the possibilities of meaning when not subject to empirical verification.

     

    Example: Circumstantial or judgemental

    Although well constructed, the empirical studies involved have proved inconclusive.

     

    Example: Argumentative shifts

    However, we have not been able to illustrate a significant relationship between childhood obesity and increased marketing expenditure.

     

    In the first example, the phrase ‘Prior to Bourdieu and Foucault’ gives the main clause greater temporal specification. The second example uses an introductory clause with a spatial preposition ‘outside’, marking the metaphorical limits of the subject of the main clause. In the third example, the introductory clause passes judgement, as an additional comment, on the studies carried out. While in the final example, ‘However’ functions to introduce the sentence and mark a shift in the writer’s assertions. All the introductory elements in the sentences above could be removed and the sentences would still make sense and maintain their core meaning. Including these introductory elements adds a degree of sophistication and detail.

     

    3. Inserting additional information at the end of a sentence

    This use of a comma marks off phrases in a similar way to the previous examples of introductory and contextual phrases at the start of the sentence. Without wanting to add to much technical detail, both these types of additional phrases add what grammarians and linguists would call adverbial and prepositional phrases. These phrases can often occur either at the beginning, end, or even the middle of a main clause. Their mobility and optional nature are the key ways in which you can identify them, which is useful if you are trying to unpack your writing when editing early drafts.

    Example:

    Early approaches to grammar were idealised and rule governed, rather than based on applied observations.

    Note how in the previous example the additional element could just as easily be put at the front of the sentence and remain coherent. In this next example the additional information cannot be moved around the sentence (this is an example of 2.5), but both the example above and the one below are subordinate clauses unable to stand on their own.

    Example:

    Herrington (1999) argues in the context of his research into racism and the state, which contrasts state and community driven projects, that greater social inclusion is achieved by…

     

    4. Signalling implications, examples and introducing argumentative points

    Certain words, used along with a comma, are very important in academic writing when signalling implications, examples and introducing argumentative points. If a sentence starts with a linking phrase or word then a comma should be used. Examples of linking words and phrases are, however, moreover, nevertheless, for example, as such, consequently, furthermore, in fact, indeed and similarly, amongst others.

    Example:

    In summation, a negative impact was recorded.

     

    Example:

    Thirdly, the implication of their argument is unfounded.

     

    Example:

    Similarly, experimentation is a necessary process to scientific investigation.

     

    5. Parenthetical elements mid-sentence

    These are subordinate clauses marked which add addition information as an extra comment or aside.

    Example:

    Doctoral dissertations and other academic genres are undergoing a period of significant change, and this will certainly continue, due to a new research agenda and new technology.

     

    6. Forms of address (appositives) and places names

    These conventions are probably familiar to people but for comprehensiveness and accuracy of use are included below.

    Example: Appositives

    James Smith, Professor of Genetics, pioneered research in human genetics.

     

    Example: Places

    CaledonianUniversity, Glasgow, pioneered research in nursing.

     

    7. One of a kind

    Commas help distinguish when something is one of a kind and not one of many. For example:

    Example:

    Lilith frequently spoke of her late husband, Jeremiah, on these occasions.

    If Lilith were a polygamist or her religion afforded her the opportunity to have several husbands or she was windowed more than once then the commas could be removed. For scholarly writing, one must be more careful when referring to things like publications. The next example would be incorrect:

    Example:

    Professor Smith published his seminal work in the UK based journal, Rheumatology, for maximum impact.

    Rheumatology is not the only UK based journal. Therefore, the following would be better:

     

    Example:

    Professor Smith published his seminal work in the number one UK based journal, Rheumatology, for maximum impact.

    There can be only one ‘number one’ journal, therefore, Rheumatology must be enclosed in commas.

     

    8. Lists and multiple adjectives modifying a noun

    Commas are used to separate components of a list.

    Example:

    This study selected males aged 20, 25, 30 and 35.

    Commas are also used to separate coordinating adjectives which modify a noun but not non-coordinating adjectives. Coordinating adjectives are of equal status and the final adjective in the list is preceded by ‘and’. One can recognise coordinating adjectives if: their order can change without effecting meaning; and ‘and can be placed in between them without effecting meaning. For example,

    Smith’s exciting, well researched and influential study was initially ignored.

     

    The list in this sentence can be reordered without becoming grammatically incoherence,

    Smith’s well researched, influential and exciting study was initially ignored.

     

    Non-coordinating adjectives cannot fulfil the above conditions, as in,

    Smith’s new rheumatology study is groundbreaking.

     

    The order of these two adjectives cannot be reversed; ‘Smith’s rheumatology new study’ would just not make sense. The initial adjective ‘new’ is subordinate to the second adjective ‘rheumatology’. Therefore, in instances such as these commas are not used.

     

    9. Setting off quotations

    This is probably very familiar to scholarly writers. The two main uses are marking reported speech and introducing quotations.

    Example: Quotations

    Smith (1956) noted, ‘subjects presented with extremely large facial cysts on the third day of the trial’.

     

    Example: Reported speech

    “The facial cysts were particularly painful and smelt a lot”, reported one patient in Smith’s (1956) study.

     

     10. Numbers

    Commas are used with large numbers over a thousand. For example,

     

    Example:        

    1,000

    10,000

    100,000

    1,000,000

     

    Full stops, not commas, are used in decimals.

    And that’s about it, but a note of caution. The above are presented as if they are ‘rules’; I prefer to view them as conventions. Just because you can use a comma doesn’t necessarily mean you have to. In the setting out of appositives and numbers the conventions are very strong and always aids clarity. However, in other instances commas can be useful in indicating the different types of clause relationships that exist in the sentence you have constructed, but if you put a comma everywhere it is possible to the sentence can look cluttered or even confusing. In these instances the question is, what aids the reader? This may be quite subjective but think about using commas to aid communicating the meaning you intend.

  • The Three Main Uses of Colons

    Many people seem unsure how to use colons, however, the principles underlying their use are quite simple. Below is an explanation of the ‘rules’ of their use in Standard English.

    In addition to using this punctuation mark when indicating time, as in 4:30am, the colon has three uses in English prose. In general, all four uses signal a grammatical break greater than a comma, introducing clauses that expand or clarify the previous main clause.

    1 Making exemplifications and signalling illustrations

    In this form the a second clause supports the first, or rather the full meaning of the sentence needs the subsequent exemplification or illustration:

     

    Example:

    Some animals are exceptional fast: over fifty metres greyhounds can out run the average family car.

     

    Example:

    Carl Marx was a philanderer: many of his illegitimate children were employed in his Engels’ cotton factories (reference).

     

    This form can be filled, as in:

    Many of Marx’s Illegitimate children were employed in Engels’ cotton factories (reference): he was a philanderer.

     

    2. Signalling an illustrative list

    This use of the colon can be useful in academic writing when wishing to make complicated lists, separating constituent elements of the list with semi-colons (information on the use of semicolons in extended lists will follow in Section 4 below).

    Example:

    There are four main researchers involved in this study: Professor Susan Jones, JohnHopkinsUniversity; Professor James Smith, University of Illinois; Dr Timothy Taylor, BelfastQueensUniversity; and Dr Samuel Khan, BelfastQueensUniversity.

     

    And this example, adapted from the historian Anthony Smith’s (2008: 12) book The Cultural Foundations of Nations:

    Example:

    For most modernists, the nation is characterized by: a well-defined territory; a unified legal system and common legal institutions; participation in the social life and politics of the nation; a mass public culture disseminated by means of a public, standardized, mass education system; collective autonomy institutionalized in a sovereign territorial state; membership of the nation in an “inter-national” system of the community of nations.

    This method of displaying a complex list also lends itself to bullet points; in fact, Smith’s original text has all the elements of the list after the colon as six distinct, numbered points.

    3. Introducing an extended quotation/extract

    This is particularly common in academic writing. Use the colon when the quotation starts at the beginning of a sentence.

     

    Example:

    Garton, Montgomery and Tolson go on to suggest:

    Particular ideological assumptions and narrative scenarios occupy a place of dominance within this forum, to the extent that their pervasive solidity as forms of common sense is very difficult to challenge. (1991: 116)

    Some extended extracts may start mid-sentence and grammatically follow on from your own text, in which case a comma or no punctuation mark might work, as long as this is consistent with the use of commas indicated above.

    The colon presents a writer with different forms of sentence construction that just cannot be achieved with commas alone. For that reason they are well worth learning.

  • Things To Try

    Paragraphs: A Manual for the Idea Machine

    This is a short piece I wrote for ClimateSnack on how to write better paragraphs, and then use them as the key to editing and developing a good flow.

    The Pomodoro Technique

    One of the hardest things to do is to get writing and keep writing. Try out the pomodoro technique. It’s so simple: just write in 25minute bites, with five minute breaks. You can build up stamina over time, adding additional 25 minute chunks. Vary the time up or down to suit your concentration levels. The trick is not to go for too long nor too short. There are a number of free pomodoro timers out there (see tomato-timer.com, the Pomodroid App on Android phones; and Simple Pomodoro Timer on iPad and iPhone). Failing that just buy a cheap kitchen timer.